School Crime And Violence

abhorrence and violence in trails ar issues that ar of substantial public concern, especially afterward the series of tragic school shootings recently. The schools fix exercised cargon in making the students safe notwithstanding many schools are now facing serious tasks so that effective strategies can be devised to prevent school violence and increase school safety. (Small and Tetrick). The terms school violence and school safety, are still terms that need to be commonly defined.The authors moderate that Multiple approaches can prove beneficial as each discipline brings to bear the full force of its knowledge and experience, but they complicate the task of summarizing the state of school violence. For instance, should school violence be considered a subset of youth violence? (Small and Tetrick). Most of the violence in schools are involved in gangs. A gang is a group of tribe who form an allegiance for a common purpose and engage in unnatural lawful or criminal activity. Gangs give components companionship, guidance, excitement and identity.When a member needs something, the otherwises come to the rescue and provide valueion. Gangs members put one all over significantly deject levels of self-esteem compared to their non-gang peers. They overly could name fewer adult role models than did their non-gang ,peers. It is no doubt that America has become a violent society. Television programs merely show gruesome murders and violence as if they are normal incidences in our lives. It is said that children learn to imitate the violence that they cod on television. These ware root in a lot of issues, foremost of which is on gasolene pull wires.The incontrovertible effects of the strict enforcement of numbfish laws are readily seen. The Brady contract, for archetype believes that background checks nationwide stopped over 600,000 felons and other prohibited purchasers from buying hand ordnances from federally licensed firearm dealers. Some say this is one huge reason why there is a need to advocate particle accelerator hold in. Once tidy sum realize that there is a direct correlational statistics between the increases in violence as correlated with gun possession, they would also be against gun violence in society. However, opinions are at odds with regards to the issue of gun concur.Remarkably, both advocates and opponents of gun mince policies in the join States use statistics to back up their stance. The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports that According to the internal Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), in 2003, 449,150 victims of violent hatreds stated that they approach an offender with a firearm. Incidents involving a firearm represented 7% of the 4. 9 million violent crimes of rape and sexual assault, robbery, and aggravated and simple assault. The FBIs Crime in the United States estimated that 67% of the 16,503 murders in 2003 were committed with firearms. throttle valve break vs. Gun Rights). Adv ocates of gun get wind directly use statistics such as this to assert that the increase in violence is positively correlated with gun possession. Organizations such as the National Rifle Association of America (NRA) and other proponents of gun rights oppose such view. Alexander, for one, insists that such arguments contradict literal studies.He contradicts the correlation, saying that cities with the most restrictive gun laws, like Washington, D. C. , and Atlanta, Georgia, in fact, have the highest murder rates in the nation. At the center of the gun control issue is the Second Amendment to the Constitution A well regulated Militia, creation necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to hold in and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Arguments usually focus on the interpretation of the law. The Second Amendment is the main banner of gun rights activists. Gun control advocates, on the other hand, feel that gun control opponents misinterpret the law when the y assume that it means absolute right to ownership of guns by common soldier individuals (Krouse).They assert that the Second Amendment only refers to gun ownership in mail of militia and not for general purposes. Gun control supporters feel that gun possession by just anybody is a contributing cause of increase incidence of crimes in the United States. In Guns and Terror, Berger and Henigan present studies to support their instruction that Gun shows are a breeding ground for gun gross revenue to terrorist and that nothing in federal law prevents terrorists from quickly amassing arsenals of weapons (4).Opponents to the gun control movement also believe that there is not enough factual evidence to the other sides claim that banning the deal of some kinds of guns result to lower crime rates (Gun mince vs. Gun Rights). Alexander accuses gun control groups of demagogue-ing the issue and maintains that the root of the problem is culture, and not the gun. He even notes that many of t he problems in question are the result of Leftist doctrines. The Brady Campaign believes that stricter rules on gun ownership depart result in communities with minimal crimes since they correlate guns with most crimes committed.Proponents of gun control also base this belief on what they see as positive effects of enforcement of gun laws. The Brady Campaign, for example believes that background checks nationwide stopped over 600,000 felons and other prohibited purchasers from buying handguns from federally licensed firearm dealers. Gun rights proponents maintain that stricter rules could actually cause crime rates to rise as criminals only tend to go places with stricter gun rules.Alexander quotes Thomas Sowell as saying, Most criminals arent that stupid they tend to go where the guns arent. (Brady Campaign to clog Gun Violence). Proponents of gun control continue to push for the passage of brisk laws and/or amendments to existing laws to restrict gun ownership. For one, they a re lobbying for legislation cover version what they refer to as loopholes, specifically in issues such as late access to firearms, and sales at gun shows and through the Internet (Brady Campaign).Opponents are also continuing efforts to gather support to counter the move of gun control advocates. The NRA is drawing support through massive information point advocating Second Amendment rights and the protection of Americans hunting heritage. The NRA also performs studies and surveys contradicting the position of gun control supporters. In their survey on what Americans think of Right-to-Carry laws, results show that 79% of the voters stood in favor of such laws (National Rifle Association of America).The Brady Campaign notes, according to an abstract of the FBI Uniform Crime Report, the percentage of violent crimes committed with firearms has declined dramatically after the Brady Law went into effect. Supporters of gun control assert the need for more restrictions in gun ownershi p, especially in the federal level. They call for stricter background checks for people who intend to purchase licensed firearms. Gun rights supporters do not see additional laws and amendments to laws as a solution to increase in crime rates.Alexander writes, Gun restrictions have not protected citizens in Atlanta, Washington, D. C. , unexampled York or Boston, much less anyone in Columbine or ruby Lake. Nor did such laws protect Jews from Hitler or Stalin or Chinese peasants from Mao, etc. , ad infinitum. Alexander also advises politicians and gun controllers alike to look at the heathenish aspects of the problem and not the instruments. The National Rifle Association of America has foreign every effort by gun control advocates, specially the Brady Campaign group, which they think leave encroach on their rights under the Second Amendment.They maintain that gun ownership is their constitutional right and should not be check to recreational purposes only. The NRA, in fact, is supporting enactment of laws involving Self-Defense and freedom to choose guns (Alexander, Mark 2005). Indeed, the right of law-abiding citizens to carry concealed firearms for purpose of self-defence has become a hot and controversial topic and one that will continue to be so for a long time. Schools need to protect the children from these gun-toting individuals and avoid another Columbine or Virginia Tech incident.