Friday, March 22, 2019
Racial Profiling by Police Essay -- Stop and Frisk
The Fourth Amendment protects the right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures (108). Under the Fourth Amendment the legal constraints placed on police and the rules they essential follow for Stop and romp happened as a result of the Terry v. Ohio object lesson (162). The constraints be that the police cannot stopped and play people without reasonable suspicion probable cause or a warrant. Before 1968 the police could search a suspect only if they had probable cause. After the Terry case the police may conduct a divert search of a suspects outer vesture only if there was reasonable suspicion. The U.S. Supreme Court definition of Frisk is a patting down of the outer clothing of a suspect found on the reasonable suspicion, designed to protect a police officeholder from attack with a weapon when making an inquiry. A Search is an geographic expedition for evidence. Although frisk are restricted to a sea rch for weapons that may devil an immediate threat to the officers safety, the Court concluded that cases as these are decided by their own facts generally, however, police officers who see preposterous conduct that leads them to conclude that criminal activity are involved and that the persons are armed and dangerous are entitled to conduct a carefully limited search of the outer clothing of such persons trying to go against weapons that may be used to assault them (163) Such a frisk are reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, and any weapons seized is introduced in evidence. fair suspicion is when a police officer has good reason to call up that criminal activity may be occurring as in the case of Terry v. Ohio (162). The police officer observed thre... ...s under OMalley (100,000) that OMalley won by a landslide by the number of start made. On the other hand Mayor Rawlings engaged the targeted approached and went after tempestuous and repeated offenders which resulted in a decrease in homicide to fewer than cc in 2011. Racial indite contributes to many frivolous minor infractions that burdens the prosecutors to capture these cases to court. The court are overwhelmed with trying these cases and that takes time away from the more cutthroat cases As a result the correctional facilities becomes overcrowded which cost the state money. Policing must not be initiated by numbers, race, ethnicity or national origin. Racial profiling violates an individuals civil right and if being done it violates the quaternate Amendment right.Works CitedAlbanese, Jay S. Criminal Justice. Upper Saddle River Pearson, 2013. Print.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.