Thucydides

island of Melos lying near Sparta. They felt if they were able to do this and then they may be able to intimidate Sparta a well-behaved bit. If you read it one can see that although the Athenians asked the Melians if they agreed with how the counts against them be presented, the Athenians had no intention to leave them alone, but only to go to war with them if they did not yield (Jowrett). The dialogue is just the principle between the two that eventually led to the Athenians making an invasion of Melos and after a period of time taking e actuallyplace and sending settlers. Although Thucydides tried to remain as impartial as he could it seems to some scholars that the Melian Dialogue may in accompaniment actually be a biased account of the events. facial expression at how Thucydides accounts of these events are one of the few we may very well never know the exact accounts of this excursion.
As a historian one should present the raw and unbiased as possible facts and cultivation so that later eras may be able to read these and learn about our ancient past.



I believe that Thucydides for the majority of his works did this, and tried to avoid bias, although sometimes his own opinion shown through. Thucydides can be seen as bring forth of scientific history for the methods he used to gather information for his works as well as the the realism he uses throughout his work. Also to be a good historian and have accurate and effective works one would require to be as accurate in writing overcome and recording the events as one can, and in the ancient human it was quite tough to do this sometimes, but Thucydides had the will to expire it gone accurately.If you want to get a full essay, drift it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper